A Slow Response But At Least A Response
I filed a petition with the FDA in 2014 to ban the Flouriquinolone Class of antibiotics from common prescription use. I requested it to have the label changed so that it is not used for everyday conditions, such as UTI, bronchitis, and similar diseases that are easily treatable by other antibiotics and which do not need a broad spectrum antibiotic. I recommended to have Fluroquinolones be reserved for life-and-death situations only when there are no alternatives and to change the label reflecting all adverse side effect that were already well understood, and to “blackbox” the medication. In my previous article on this subject, found here, I updated the FDA information, since new side effects made it imperative to immediately restrict all quinolones from common use. Why is this all interesting now? Because of a letter I just received from the FDA!
4-Years in the Making and an Invalid Response
Fluoroquinolones Back in the News
I have written many times about the fluoroquinolones family of antibiotics, referred to as quinolones on the run and often by the condition they so far were the most well-known for: causing major neurological damage–often permanent–leading to a condition termed FLOXED. I spent quite a bit of time fighting for blackboxing quinolones, which was finally achieved in 2016. There were many lawsuits on the part of those injured by quinolones as well. I wrote many articles about the trouble they cause, health stories, even about a suicide, and general information. See some here, here, here, here, here, and here.
The Drugs in the Fluoroquinolones Class:
- ciprofloxacin (CIPRO, CILOXAN)
- enoxacin (PENETREX)
- levofloxacin (LEVAQUIN)
- moxifloxacin (AVELOX)
- norfloxacin (NOROXIN, CHIBROXIN)
- ofloxacin (FLOXIN, OCUFLOX)
Posted in Big Pharma, Drugs of Shame, FDA, Healthcare, Interesting reading, Must Read, This & That, Thoughts
Tagged fluoroquinolones are harmful, quinolone damage, quinolones and low blood sugar, quinolones are harmful, quinolones cause aneurysm, quinolones kill
What Research Should Be Funded?
In November 2018 through December 15, 2018, the NIH invited public comments to guide the kind of research they will support for the next decade. This comment period was short but critical. Historically, the NIH has been influenced tremendously by business interests that provide huge chucks of financial support to the government and thereby to the NIH. Thus there has ever been any unbiased research funding for nutrition research. This may also be true of other research areas–I am no familiar with them.
I found it very important to submit my commentary, which I did on the 11th of December, so a few days before the deadline. Here I copy-paste my commentary so you can see what I see as weakness in the NIH funding process through my recommendations. There is no way to know if the NIH considers anyone’s recommendations at all. However, it cannot hurt to try. Right? Right. So here is my comment, which starts with the greeting letter. I copy-paste the whole thing. I also attach it in a PDF in case you want to download it–it is a public document now: NIH–comment–AAStanton–12-11-2018 Continue reading
Posted in diabetes, Healthcare, Interesting reading, Must Read, nutrition, Thoughts
Tagged funded nutrition research, NIH commentary, NIH nutrition research, NIH research funding, NIH research guidelines, what is nutrition, what research exist in nutrition
Astroturfing is the practice of masking the sponsors of a message or organization (e.g., political, advertising, religious or public relations) to make it appear as though it originates from and is supported by grassroots participants. It is a practice intended to give the statements or organizations credibility by withholding information about the source’s financial connection. The term astroturfing is derived from AstroTurf, a brand of synthetic carpeting designed to resemble natural grass, as a play on the word “grassroots.” The implication behind the use of the term is that instead of a “true” or “natural” grassroots effort behind the activity in question, there is a “fake” or “artificial” appearance of support. (source: you guessed it, Wikipedia)
And who is the most well-known astroturfing entity that is publicly visible and is used by millions every day for what they think is good information? Wikipedia!
And you thought you knew Wikipedia! And you may even have donated money to Wikipedia every year–like I have been–thinking it is for an open database of great information that knowledgeable people edit and update. Right? Wrong.
Wikipedia is Astroturfing
According to the above TEDx, Wikipedia is Astroturfing and indeed, it is. I had my own Continue reading
Posted in Big Pharma, Healthcare, Interesting reading, Must Read, nutrition, This & That, Thoughts, Videos
Tagged is wikipedia paid by pharma/, what is astroturf, who pays wikipedia, wikipedia is astroturf, wikipedia is biased
The image shows how cardiovascular disease is not associated with high cholesterol, yet the article concluded that high cholesterol causes coronary cardiovascular events.
coronary artery disease cause
Yellow highlighting is mine to show what actually does contribute to cardiovascular events.
How strange that scientists have to conclude the opposite of what their data shows to be able to publish!
Sugar is Addictive and Causes Diabetes
Sugar Pack in Sri Lanka–photograph by Marc Richard
I run a Facebook migraine group with thousands of members. The goal is to become migraine free, using only nutritional methods, which over the years has turned into what I call the Stanton Migraine Protocol(R). We have many discussions on foods in the group and sugar often comes up–sugar is something migraineurs should not ever eat. The members also post hundreds of testimonials into the group, which I then ask for permission to share on my testimonials page. Take a look at our success stories.
The Case of Sugar Warning
Posted in diabetes, Healthcare, Must Read, nutrition, This & That, Thoughts
Tagged avoid sweeteners, processed foods are unhealthy, should we put warning on sugar?, Sri Lanka warning on sugar, sugar is bad for you, sugar is unhealthy
What is a Carbage Article?
In September, a “carbage” (carb garbage) article was published in The Lancet Public Health based on very inadequate data analysis, that made the headlines in less than 5 minutes around the world. I have written two previous blog articles about it. See how bad the science was in that paper here and see the ripple effects of such bad science here.
The headlines of that academic article suggested that the consumption of reduced carbohydrates is dangerous. Lots of news flashes followed and several generations of hard nutrition-science work were swept under the rug by those who benefit from industrial profits and those with conflicts of interests (including some of the original authors, who didn’t declare such conflicts of interests!). However, sensationalism is just about that: no one cares about truth and facts, only headlines. In fact, headlines were twisted to make it even more sensational, stopping just short of suggesting that you will die tomorrow if you don’t eat a slice of cake today.
Posted in Healthcare, Interesting reading, Must Read, nutrition, Press Release, This & That, Thoughts
Tagged bad academic article, bad academic articles, carbage article, carbohydrates are bad for us, carbohydrates are good for us?, carbohydrates shorten your life, read about carbs, reduced carbohydrates shorten your life, The Lancet Public Health Best correspondences
Over the years I have received several hundred (maybe add a zero to that) testimonials from migraineurs who use my protocol, which is LCHF or my special ketogenic diet, designed specifically for migraineurs. I sometimes share a testimonial here and there. I am sharing this one because it is so amazing. Although this migraineur permits me to use his name, I prefer not to since he is an attorney. Enjoy the story.
About my interview with BioHackers Lab:
“Angela is my guru. Loved your interview on Biohackers.
Posted in Healthcare, Interesting reading, migraine, Migraine-Blog, Must Read, nutrition, This & That, Thoughts, Videos
Tagged electrolyte and migrane, migraine and electrolyte, migraine and salt, migraine and sodium, migraine curable, migraine cure, migraine disease, migraine gtreatment, migraine salt cure, migraine salt fix
***This is a re-post of Dr. Lundberg’s note found at MedScape it is also in video but you need to have an account to see it. The re-post is based on copy-paste, with link to the original. There is nothing added or subtracted from his comment. Here is what he said and wrote. Since this entire piece is a quote, I am not placing quotation around it. Just understand that it is not me talking here:
August 24, 2018 Continue reading
Posted in Big Pharma, diabetes, Healthcare, Interesting reading, Must Read, nutrition, Press Release, This & That, Thoughts
Tagged chief editor of JAMA, fat is bad, fat is good for us, Gary Taubes on fat, nutrition nightmare, nutrition science, nutrition truth
“When scientists die, their published papers live on—even if they’re based on lies. Downloaded in seconds from anywhere in the world, fake results continue to steal other scientists’ time, influencing their choice of which research avenues to follow and which trials to design and seek ethical approval for.” (here)
When I wrote my blog last week Taking Apart Bad Science, I had not yet read the article from which I took the quote above. Coincidentally that article and my blog published on the same day.
What Bad Science Is & What It Does
Good scientific findings make the news much less often than headlines based on bad science. Unfortunately, the science you hear on TV or read about in newspapers is more likely to be bad science than real science. What do I mean by bad science? Bad science can be bad for two reasons: Continue reading
Posted in diabetes, Healthcare, Interesting reading, Must Read, nutrition, This & That, Thoughts
Tagged bad science, killer science, low carbohydrate diets, low carbs bad for you, low carbs good for you, nutrition is in trouble, nutrition science, ripple effect of a bad article, the bad article in the lancet, Willett's bad article