
I am sure you know what cholesterol is and also believe that doctors and scientists all know what cholesterol is and they also should know what cholesterol does. I beg to disagree.
LDL: Is Yours High or Low?
I was thinking about the reason for the high LDL in some folks and low LDL in other folks. Our healthcare is very LDL-focused but does anyone understand what LDL actually is?
LDL is not cholesterol. It never was and never will be a cholesterol. LDL is acronym for Low Density Lipoprotein and, as the acronym implies, it is a lipid (fat) and protein ball. Cholesterol is not a fat but a waxy substance that cannot travel in the blood, which is water-based. LDL on the blood tests is the measure of these little balls made of protein and fat. So why are we calling it a cholesterol and why are we measuring it?
Good question.
HDL: Is Yours High or Low?
Not unlike LDL, HDL is also not a cholesterol. HDL is an acronym for High Density Lipoprotein. Yep, you guessed it, it too is a lipid and protein ball and not cholesterol. So why are we calling it cholesterol and why are we measuring it?
Good question.
TRIGLYCERIDES: IS YOURS HIGH OR LOW?
Triglycerides aren’t cholesterol either. They are actually fats gathered into triplets and connected with a glycerol cap. Triglycerides are interesting because, unbeknown to most people, doctors, and scientists, most human organs use these non-esterified fatty acids as fuel. Yep, our body is not a glucose burner: it is a fat-burner. Interestingly, to show easily that the heart and skeletal muscles use free fatty acids as fuel instead of glucose, I had to go to a UK NHS website.
Getting to the Chase
If the measurement of LDL, HDL, and triglycerides are not measuring cholesterol, then what exactly do we measure under the disguise of a blood test for cholesterol?
And this is where my point becomes interesting. Looking at LDL and HDL we learn how many “containers” we have, each of which carries cholesterol and other things, such as fat-soluble vitamins A, E, and K2–and perhaps D3 (a hormone) as well.
A standard cholesterol test cannot measure cholesterol because cholesterol is not actually present in our blood!
What we have in our blood are these lipoprotein vehicles in which cholesterol travels. Have you seen freeway overpasses in your past where a person stands and presses a counter button every time a vehicle passes under? I have. Every vehicle, be it a motorbike with one person or a buss with 80 people on it get one click. This counter can certainly count how many vehicles are on that freeway but not how many people travel on that freeway.
There are variances in vehicle sizes and also people sizes! If the people are tiny, more can fit into a small car than if the people are large, not to mention the size differences between vehicles, such as a motorbike vs a bus.
And this is where understanding the significance of what we are NOT measuring becomes visibly important. If we want to know about the cholesterol, we need to measure cholesterol and not the container in which it travels.
The reason is simple: if my cholesterol particles are the small and dense (unhealthy) type, I can pack each LDL vehicle chock full of thousands of cholesterol particles and so I need fewer LDLs.
If you were a cholesterol particle and you were small and dense, how many of you could fit into an LDL, which is a given size? A lot… and so with bad types of cholesterol particles--small and dense--a person needs fewer LDLs because each can be packed full of small dense cholesterol particles. So having naturally low LDL is not necessarily a good sign! It may be a terrible sign that the person is unhealthy!
By contrast, I may have very large cholesterol particles (large and fluffy, the healthy kinds). If I have the large and fluffy kinds, I must have more LDLs (the vehicle) to carry these larger and fluffier cholesterol particles, because I can only put a few into each LDL.
If you were a cholesterol particle and you were large, how many of you could fit into an LDL, which is a given size? Very few! So you will need more LDLs because so few can fit into each that you have to produce more to carry the same number of cholesterol particles. Having a large number of LDLs may be very healthy!
Based on this, not only is it a problem to only look at LDL and HDL and not the cholesterol particles within, but by aiming to reduce LDL to some artificially derived ideal may be very harmful!
SO: IS HIGH LDL A PROBLEM?
It may be.
If you have lots of LDLs but each is full of small dense cholesterol particles, it is a problem. If you have lots of large and fluffy cholesterol particles, then high LDL is desired. You need to find out what your cholesterol particle sizes are and not how many LDL or HDL balls they travel in.
This is a mathematical and engineering problem of size.
Conclusion
Do we have cholesterol understanding completely backwards when we want to reduce LDL? Absolutely! Those with naturally low LDL may be a lot less healthy than those with naturally high levels of LDL. The truth is the “pudding” so to speak.
Have your cholesterol checked using NMR. NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) is able to see the number and size of cholesterol particles inside the LDL and the HDL balls. It can tell you in great detail if your cholesterol is the healthy large and fluffy type or the dangerous small dense type. And the only importance of the letters LDL and HDL will be so you know where they are looking at for your cholesterol size and type. There is zero reason to look at your cholesterol in a regular standard blood test. You are learning nothing about your health.
Comments are welcome, as always, and are moderated for appropriateness.
Angela
Pingback: does instant coffee raise cholesterol? – Coffee Tea Room
Pingback: does coffee cause cholesterol? – Coffee Tea Room
Pingback: is coffee bad for your cholesterol? – The coffee around
Pingback: can coffee cause high cholesterol? – Coffee Tea Room
Pingback: can i drink coffee before a bone density test? – Coffee Tea Room
Hi Angela. Thanks for the info. When I first learned of this deception in 2019, I sat down and wrote a book to explain it to people and then put this up on Amazon at a low cost to encourage people to buy and read. “Take Back Your Health”, by George Elder. Then I set up a blog to support the book and link to the book, http://www.takebackyrhealth.com. If you get a chance to take a look and then promote this a little it may gain us a few more supporters. Thanks.. George Elder
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sure George, it is promoted right here–and also in your previous link. 🙂
Thanks,
Angela
LikeLike
I have high Cholesterol and since I had a stroke in 5/2021 am prescribed 80mg of a statin drug. Ugg. Not sure of a Dr. That performs the NMR but sounds very interesting to me. I hate taking medication because they all make you feel worse not better.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kathy if you are in the US, you can order your own NMR in most states from places like http://www.requestatest.com and others. It’s about $100. Some doctors actually do order NMR. I see them time to time popping up as part of a regular blood test from some of my migraineurs.
In terms of stroke and cholesterol. First, I ma sorry you had a stroke. I presume it was a TIA and you are fully recovered. Most cardiovascular issues start with eating the wrong diet. The Standard American Diet (SAD) that incorporates a lot of grains, veg/seed oils, and processed foods is a very unhealthy diet that can cause a lot of problems.
By now we know that there is nothing worse for us to eat than veg/seed oils and processed foods, and just about everything is processed these days! Grains are terrible for the body and cereals, pastas, pizza, and other grains are all massively inflammatory. Combine all these inflammatory foods with sugar, and there is a stroke and/or heart attack is the outcome.
Strokes and heart attacks were a rarity prior to processed food madness. I grew up in the 50s and 60s in Europe where we had no oils, no processed foods, not even sugar at home. We ate a wholesome meat-based diet with animal fats and we all were healthy.
I suggest you look at your diet first, make changes if you are willing, and request an NMR–pay for it out of pocket if you must, it’s a simple blood test that requires 12-14 hours fasting, no coffee either, and that’s that.
Good luck to you!
Angela
LikeLike
The laboratory method is able to separate the particles into HDL and Non-HDL, as I recall it used either the Apo-A or Apo-B apo-lipoprotein, and then they are ruptured. The triglycerides were also inside those particles and are measured by ruputring all the particles of an unsorted sample, and are measured by a reaction of the glycerol, so it independent of the actual lengths and saturations of the fatty acids. The cholesterol in each of the HDL versus LDL are measured that way. There are formulas which allow one to estimate the size of the LDL, whether fresh, large and fluffy, or old, small, rancid and glycosylated. I found a paper describing the method, but don’t remember which drive/computer it is on at the moment.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lance, some of this is correct and some aren’t. The LDL is always estimated by the formula LDL = Total – HDL – (Trig/5). The sizes and density cannot be measured or estimated. They are guessing.
Another problem I find is that now doctors encourage their patients to drink coffee freely before the test. But coffee–even black–spikes insulin and so it increases cholesterol in the blood. The standard blood lipid panel is a total waste of blood as far as I am concerned.
Regardless, we have NMR where they can measure size, quantity, type, etc., and can even tell if your lipids are suffering from insulin resistance. So if one must know their cholesterol–which I think is also often quite pointless–then at least use the right type of test.
LikeLike