6% Commission Goes to Doctors for Prescribing Drugs!

I have been meaning to write this article for several weeks but the drug Cipro and its family of Quinolones have stolen the show and importance. But now that we know how dangerous they are and hopefully everyone is aware enough to not allow it to be prescribed  to them (there are many safer alternatives!), maybe now it is time to show you the real bad, the evil, and all the sins pharmaceuticals do when it comes to their brand name drugs.

Some of you may have watched 60-Minutes Sunday night on CBS a couple of weekends ago but probably not everyone. I would like to take you to a segment of that 60-Minutes, and discuss that a little bit.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-cost-of-cancer-drugs/

In short, we all know that drugs are very expensive and that those of us with medical insurance pay only a deductible. We also know that seniors on Medicare also just pay a deductible—usually 20% according to this video. There is nothing new or interesting about this until you listen to the rest of the story.

The first thing that I think most of us had no idea of is that Medicare or the insurance companies are not allowed to negotiate prices by law. They must pay whatever they are charged. This also explains (to me anyway) why hospitals and healthcare centers have such insane prices where a single headache medicine may be charged at $50. I now understand that the $50 is the cost to Medicare or the insurance company even if I can get the same drug in the drugstore over the counter for $1. So the first problem we are facing is Medicare and the insurance companies and their inability of negotiating a lower price. Note to self: investigate who the heck came up with this idea?!

The second problem we are facing of course is that in the US we pay much more for the same drugs than other countries pay and that comes down to the fact that the government in other countries can negotiate with pharmaceutical companies but in the US the government cannot. Note to self: Why can other governments negotiate and not the one that approved the drugs the first place?! Whose idea was that?

The third problem comes down to illegal activity actually. It appears to be legal but I am questioning that–it is certainly unethical and while ethics and law are typically not good friends, in this case I am questioning the legality of the practice. On the 60-Minutes segment you hear that the pharmaceutical company Sanofi came out with a cancer drug (colon cancer) called Zaltrap that they originally charged the doctors, insurance, and patients for $11,000 per month. An older drug called Avastin for the same cancer, working exactly the same miracle the same way, only reducing (possibly) the life expectancy after treatment by 42 days relative to Zaltrap, cost only $5,000. So this one particular hospital decided to not carry the new drug; it was too expensive and did not provide better outcome than the old (except for the 42 days of additional extended life) and had more toxic side effects as well. The hospital doctors published their opinion in The New York Times which then amazingly turned Sanofi around and said: OK doctor, I will sell you the drug for $5,000 provided you charge the insurance company and the patient $11,000. We will send you dear doctor a check for $6,000. This is an amazingly lucrative business! I suppose for unethical cancer doctors this is a lottery win equivalent.

The doctors also receive what is called “commission” of 6% when they prescribe a particular drug. I finally understand why a private doctor’s office is usually full of free samples!

I finally also understand why a family doctor of a relative of mine kept on switching the drug from the generic cholesterol pill Simvastatin, which was cheap and worked great without liver issues, to Lipitor, which did not work, cost a lot of money to Medicare, and caused a lot of liver issues. Every time I went to pick up a refill for Simvastatin for my relative, a bottle of Lipitor was waiting for me instead! I never accepted the change for health reasons of that family member but now I finally understand the cause! That family doctor was receiving 6% each time he prescribed the brand name Lipitor but nothing when he prescribed the generic Simvastatin so his unethical choice was to switch the prescription every time!

I bet it is happening to many people only they are not as vigilant about checking what they are getting and why, as I am. I called this doctor and gave him my opinion… no need to repeat it… you know what I said. I am glad I fired him and switched my relative to another family doctor.

It is good to know that the medicine we pay $1,000 for in the US is available to other countries for $300 or less. Apparently their governments can negotiate and refuse if they do not like the prices. But our government, Medicare, insurance companies, and the ill are powerless!

Can anyone please explain why the US Government, Medicare and the insurance companies cannot negotiate? Will the people responsible for this craziness please this stand up and show your faces? I bet they won’t dare!

Your comments are welcome as always!

Angela

About Angela A Stanton, Ph.D.

Angela A Stanton, PhD, is a Neuroeconomist focusing on chronic pain--migraine in particular--physiology, electrolyte homeostasis, nutrition, and genetics. She lives in Southern California. Her current research is focused on migraine cause, prevention, and treatment without the use of medicine. As a forever migraineur from childhood, her discovery was helped by experimenting on herself. She found the cause of migraine to be at the ionic level, associated with disruption of the electrolyte homeostasis, resulting from genetic variations of all voltage dependent channels, gates, and pumps (chanelopathy) that modulate electrolyte mineral density and voltage in the brain. In addition, insulin and glucose transporters, and several other variants, such as MTHFR variants of B vitamin methylation process and many others are different in the case of a migraineur from the general population. Migraineurs are glucose sensitive (carbohydrate intolerant) and should avoid eating carbs as much as possible. She is working on her hypothesis that migraine is a metabolic disease. As a result of the success of the first edition of her book and her helping over 5000 migraineurs successfully prevent their migraines world wide, all ages and both genders, and all types of migraines, she published the 2nd (extended) edition of her migraine book "Fighting The Migraine Epidemic: Complete Guide: How To Treat & Prevent Migraines Without Medications". The 2nd edition is the “holy grail” of migraine cause, development, and prevention, incorporating all there is to know. It includes a long section for medical and research professionals. The book is full of academic citations (over 800) to authenticate the statements she makes to make it easy to follow up by those interested and to spark further research interest. It is a "Complete Guide", published on September 29, 2017. Dr. Stanton received her BSc at UCLA in Mathematics, MBA at UCR, MS in Management Science and Engineering at Stanford University, PhD in Economics with dissertation in neuroscience (culminating in Neuroeconomics) at Claremont Graduate University, fMRI certification at Harvard University Medical School at the Martinos Center for Neuroimaging for experimenting with neurotransmitters on human volunteers, certification in LCHF/ketogenic diet from NN (Nutrition Network), certification in physiology (UPEN via Coursea), Nutrition (Harvard Shool of Public Health) and functional medicine studies. Dr. Stanton is an avid sports fan, currently power weight lifting and kickboxing. For relaxation (yeah.. about a half minute each day), she paints and photographs and loves to spend time with her family of husband of 45 years, 2 sons and their wives, and 2 granddaughters. Follow her on Twitter at: @MigraineBook, LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/angelaastantonphd/ and facebook at https://www.facebook.com/DrAngelaAStanton/
This entry was posted in Fibromyalgia, Interesting reading, Migraine-Blog, Must Read, This & That, Thoughts, Videos and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to 6% Commission Goes to Doctors for Prescribing Drugs!

  1. Pingback: A Nurse Who Saw « The Thinking Housewife

  2. Pingback: Are You Getting Floxed by Your Doctor? | Clueless Doctors & Scientists

  3. Pingback: Overnight About 30 Million Americans Suffer From Hypertension - Bert Dohmen

  4. June Gardner says:

    You are so right when you say there are many doctors who should not be doctors at all…
    I was a healthy 58 year old who rarely went to doctors and rarely took any type of drug. I (24) pack of paracetamol lasted me a year, and after a group of unscrupulous doctors tricked me into a totally unnecessary radical hysterectomy, harming me irreparably and now I have to take pain killers all the time…

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Steven S Lapp says:

    My default position in regards to the drug companies ,as well as some doctors, is that of suspicion. The question I have (concerning the info you shared ) is if there is actual evidence of this 6% kickback, or is it a theory ? My son is currently under a doctors care for Lymes treatment and was told by the doctor that he also has another disease he contracted from a tick bite. The antibiotics for the ( other ) disease cost ? $1200.00 for a 21 day supply !

    Liked by 1 person

    • Be Healthy says:

      Hi Steven,

      Your question is very valid. The 6% is not a rumor at all though things may have changed now that we have the “open database” that released all payments received by doctors from all pharmaceuticals for the years 2013, 2014, and 2015–perhaps the 2016 data will be completed soon and uploaded. When you type in your doctor’s name, just type the last name (they often modify how they enter the first name so they cannot be found), and the state! Not even the city or zip. It will find many doctors with that name so click on yours. When you find your doctor, click on his/her name. A new screen will appear with the name, the amount and also the number of transactions. I am trying to include a screen capture of a doctor I “used to know” but no longer, obviously. The picture insert didn’t work but here is the picture. And this doctor is small change compared to some who I found receiving hundreds of thousands of dollars. I even found some that earn millions. This is not fake data but provided to us by our own government–something good our tax money is going towards.

      It may not be 6% that they receive–that is something the pharma rep said and she probably knows better. The database just shows to totals and the number of transactions. They changed the database a bit since last year you could see what the transactions were! Now you cannot but you can download the entire data-set and that may help you find the answer in full. Visit here and click on “Download Data”. It saves it is MS Excel .cvs format.

      Best,
      Angela

      Like

  6. Tina Frisco says:

    I’m going to go out on a limb here, Angela, and say that the root problem isn’t who can and cannot negotiate drug prices with big pharma. Rather, the root problem IS big pharma, their deceptive practices, and their choke-hold on the public at large. They inflate the statistics regarding the cost of research & development; they lie about the number and results of clinical trials implemented and instead use the public as guinea pigs; they reap billions per year and stash it offshore to avoid paying taxes; and the list goes on. Pharmaceutical companies have to be reined in, criminally charged, and brought to justice. They’re monopolies and need to be broken up, just like the big banks and so many other big corporations. Passing legislation to allow insurance companies to negotiate with them is band aid treatment and won’t stop their heinous practices.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. AZebZ says:

    I do not understand the 6 percent per prescription written and filled by an independent pharmacy or do you mean when the prescription is filled by doctor in his office?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Be Healthy says:

      The 6% commission goes to the doctor for prescribing the medicine regardless where the prescription is filled. The sales representative from the pharmaceutical company receives a commission based on which pharmacy filled the prescription. Everyone gets paid off but the 6% goes to the doctors. This has changed by the open payment database because many doctors so took advantage of this that when the open payments database first opened, their red faces changes their tactic and now the payments are hidden under “lunches”, “meals”, “dinners”, “education”, “research”, “travel” you name it… the pharmaceuticals are very creative these days.

      Like

  8. Pingback: Really Clueless Doctors and Healthcare! | cluelessdoctors

  9. A truly thought provoking post, Angela–and many thanks for the clip.
    It is a most frightening situation we find ourselves in as consumers, and an even more frightening situation if we are consumers who are ill and must rely upon those we put our trust into when urgency doesn’t allow us the opportunity to research what’s best for ourselves or the family members we’re in charge of.
    I fear we’re in for much more of the same, at least for the foreseeable future. That almighty dollar is surely one difficult piece of paper to push aside.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Indeed! Money talks in more ways than one! I think we can change it for each one of us! When the doctor kept on changing my mom’s prescription from Simvastatin to Lipitor I refused every time and the drugstore had to call for permission to switch it back. I finally called the doctor and gave him hell. I just calculated. The average Lipitor price without insurance for a one-month supply is about $200 so that is what Medicare or the insurance company gets charged. Since it is a brand name, the doctor gets 6% kickback on that, which is $12. If he does this with this one drug alone with 100 of his patients, that is $1,200 a month extra income! And that is on one drug! Imagine the amount of money they can take home on such kickbacks! I bet it is more per month than their salaries! Shame on the pharmaceutical industry for the kickback! Shame on our government for letting this happen!

      Like

  10. Roald Michel says:

    “Can anyone please explain………” From what I know, a guy going by the name of Tommy Thompson, a former governor of Wisconsin, and G.W. Bush’s secretary of health and human services, orchestrated this magnificent law.

    Um…… free market anyone? 😛

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Stephanie says:

    Some doctors are doing similar things to people who do NOT even have cancer. Those doctors make up excuses to give very dangerous cancer drugs to people who do not have cancer. They get it for one price then charge the patients huge prices for it. So they can easily make lots of money. There have been some articles about that. A doctor here was convicted of it several yrs ago and there is a law firm currently looking into this very serious problem.

    Liked by 1 person

    • That is an amazingly scary information! There are many doctors who should not be doctors at all. I too have heard of horror stories and seen some before on 60-Minutes. It is time we put our heads together and try to force a change.

      Like

I would love to see your thoughts!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.